When I first saw the title "Craft Psychology", I thought this sounded really interesting ... what was craft psychology?
Let's talk about the book by Dr. Anne Kirketerp that was published in English this year.
Kirketerp was already a craftsperson and a craft teacher before becoming a psychologist and working in academia.
Today she runs certified educational courses in craft psychology.
The book isn't just aimed at professionals who use craft in teaching or psychology, but also crafters like you and me who are interested in using their craft more intentionally to achieve well-being.
There are ten chapters:
1. Craft psychology in a nutshell
2. Definitions of and connections between craft and well-being
3. The Craft Psychology Model
4. Central Research Findings in Craft Psychology
5. Methods and exercises
6. Four ways to craft
7. Graduation and Interventions
8. From Utility to Passion: The Role of Crafts Now and Through History
9. Theoretical Foundation of Craft Psychology
10. Brief Summary
"Craft psychology is the psychology of why people craft. It identifies how craft activities have positive effects on our physical and mental health. It can be used intentionally to effectively promote well-being."
Kirketerp notes that her "focus is primarily the hobby-based work that we do out of pure desire, because we love it and are good at it".
How do you even define craft? There are several definitions by researchers from different fields. Kirketerp herself defines it as "a mastery of passion-driven skills, resulting in products with some form of materiality". Other researchers use the words "skilled", "mastering manual skills", "to do a job well".
Maybe I'm influenced by artists telling people that making art is important and it doesn't have to be good art all the time to learn how to impress yourself and am transferring that thought to craft, but I don't necessarily agree on the "mastery".
No one is good
at the beginning (except prodigies), so they are either unhappy with it and drop it
altogether or they enjoy doing it so much that they don't care if it's "good" , and they may get better at it or not. I should know what I'm
talking about 😉 Sometimes the moment just needs to be right for picking
up the right craft.
As you may be able to tell from the chapter titles, this book really isn't about crafting itself, but the psychology behind it. If you like textbooks, you won't have a problem with that, but I have to admit that there were passages I was tempted to skip - I didn't - and others that were interesting because they explained my own behavior or feelings about or during crafting which I simply hadn't thought to analyze before, such as enjoying to get in the "flow", but also feeling like an outsider at my last crafting class some years ago (didn't finish it, never had the urge to join another one).
Kirketerp also explains her Craft Psychology Model showing how benefits of crafting, such as positive emotions, flow, achievement and more, can support well-being and shield against stress and angst, for example.
There are a lot of quotes from other researchers as well explaining different psychological theories or terms. The articles are referenced in the extensive bibliography.
What I had hoped for was a little less theory because some of it was really too repetitive for me.
There are bubbles with quotes from people Kirketerp interviewed, but there are outside of the text itself, without any comment. What I would have liked to see would have been those examples with explanations or some kind of relation between theoretical and empirical data.
I also found it disappointing that only a few crafts were mentioned, the bubbles were mostly about knitting, for example. I used to be an avid knitter for years when I was younger, and in my opinion you can't just compare knitting to any other craft 1:1. That starts with not every project being portable, but also with the setup, with how many tools you need or what size, and it also has an influence on the idea people have of the "meaningfulness" of a craft.
There is a list of examples of crafts (to be honest, "lubricating brakes" was a surprising one to me) of which not many are mentioned in the text itself.
The author concentrated on the crafts she's doing herself, I get that, but from the title I had expected more.
The book is not that difficult a read, though, even if you are not familiar with psychological research - which isn't a topic I had delved into that much about before - so you can definitely pick up some interesting facts that may make you understand things better.
For me one of those was the explanation of Default Mode Network (DMN) and Central Executive Network (CEN) - two of the brain's networks - which told me why my brain insists on going through everything embarrassing I did since I was 4 if I can't sleep at 2 a.m.
The author also gives you a few recommendations on how to use your craft intentionally. They won't be working for everyone, I know two of them don't for me anymore, but they are interesting nevertheless.
One of them - and actually that was what first caught my attention when the book was announced - is to have at least ten projects going at the same time which differ from each other in the level of challenge or purpose or surroundings (something to work on when you are alone or with others), so you can always pick the perfect one for the moment. If I have that many, they become WIPs that might never get finished. I have the infamous WIP drawer to corroborate that, but maybe I could make them count as part of the ten ...
Kirketerp also recommends not just doing coupled activities meaning you shouldn't always have the TV running - something I do although I usually just block it out once I get into the flow - or an audiobook, etc. while you are crafting.
I'm ambivalent towards the book. I enjoyed reading parts of it, others not so much because they were too theoretical and repetitive for my personal liking.
I would have been interested in some things that are missing (I admit that some of this interest is based on my own experiences, for example that of wanting to craft, but not being able to do it anymore the way I'd like to, and the consequences from that ... sorry if you feel I'm droning on about my thumb, but this has been a massive change for me). I also would have liked to see more crafts covered.
That is just my personal opinion. I don't regret reading the book, but I also don't think I would want to read it again. Maybe I should have made some notes while reading it to keep those, but that's something I'm notoriously bad at, at least with private reading.
It seems to me that with the title The Psychology of Crafting an extensive number of different crafts should have at least been mentioned, along with examples that illustrate the psychological principles, she is discussing. And I agree, “mastery” is a bit over the top. To me, crafting entails creating, not the strive for perfection. Those are two separate things.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you’re allowed to mourn your thumb.
I just don't think crafts are exchangeable and all principles are exactly the same.
DeleteAlso, to me "mastery" leaves out all the mediocre crafters who profit from crafting in some way even if they are not good at it. Take me and needle felting. I doubt I'll ever be a master, but it can be very liberating to poke a needle into something! 😉
Thank you so much for sharing about this ❤️
ReplyDeleteThank you for stopping by!
DeleteOK...I don't know about your thumb so feel free to fill me in any time you want to write a post about it. The book's title is a bit of a misnomer for want of a better word, isn't it? It seems like she cherry picked what she wanted to say and made the craft fit the narrative. I mean, I haven't read the book, but I get that feeling from your review. If I had 10 projects going at the same time, I'd never finish one...not that I ever do...but still! I like the idea behind that one, but I would be flustered about so many not being done. However, if I really sat down and thought about it I might actually already have 10!! I do need to get busy and finish some.
ReplyDeletehttps://marshainthemiddle.com/
I have rhizarthrosis in my left thumb which has become so painful in some thumb positions - mainly holding things in a certain way - that I can't craft like I used to and a lot ot days not at all. I have been fiddling around for hours almost every day in the last ten years and more. Not being able to do, but still having the creative urge has been quite hard for me.
DeleteI had a hard time explaining it very well, but I kept feeling it was a bit - I really tried to avoid the word in the review, but a bit lazy to just concentrate on the knitting so much with the empirical data? Maybe I just wasn't happy that I didn't feel it represented so many other crafts including my own. Probably the psychology itself is pretty much congruent, but I think it was a chance lost not involving the other crafts in some way.
This does feel a little like it has missed the mark - especially not integrating the interviews with the main text (I wonder if the editors asked her to do those afterwards!). I think you might enjoy that one I read the other day better as it had historical and modern sources woven into it. Also just concentrating on knitting is a bit odd, although it's the one everyone knows. I was never a knitter but did a lot of cross-stitch, which can be portable but not so much with a big project!
ReplyDeleteIt was promoted to crafters like me as well, not just people interested only in psychology, and as a crafter I wasn't satisfied.
DeleteIt was not as with the book you talked about, there were interesting parts, but still, if I had known beforehand it would be like this by the description or by the title not being as general, I doubt I would have bought it.
I haven't read the book, but since I was trained as an experimental psychologist, I can understand why the deep focus on knitting; it's not uncommon as an academic to operationalize something in research in one way (e.g. concept of craft -> operationalized as knitting) and come at it then from a lot of angles. Of course the drawback is that it can be hard to tell whether your findings apply to other operationalizations of the concept. This is particularly notable when you then target the work at a non-academic audience who is naturally going to wonder, Is this true of bead embroidery, quilting, woodworking, etc. etc.? For those of us who have done multiple types of craft, the differences between them can be really salient.
ReplyDeleteI am also curious about the way "craft" is discussed and whether mastery is an important component of that. My American English take on the word "craft" is that its older, more formal sense includes both skill/mastery as important as well as something that is your work - as in phrases like "hone your craft" or "craftsman." Things like the old European crafts guilds come to mind here. The author's own background as a weaving instructor is interesting here because weaving was absolutely a profession controlled by guilds back in the day. But I agree that there is a hobbyist sense of "an activity that involves making things by hand" as well in which whether you are skilled or not does not matter to the definition - you can call yourself a "crafter" whether you are good at the activity or not. I mean, there are tons of craft ideas out there for 3 years old to do, right? I think it matters a lot to the psychology whether you are talking about craft in the skilled artisan sense or the hobbyist making stuff sense.
This review has got me very curious about the book, so I might read it and see if it answers some of the questions raised by this post. And anyone who's trained as a research psychologist always has fun identifying the flaws in other researchers' work...wait, or is that just me?? :)
That's really interesting, thank you for that input, Sally!
DeleteI think if you emphasize that a book is also targeted at hobbyists, you would need to explain for them why you concentrate on one craft that much. I listened to a podcast episode by two knitters, clinical psychologists, they read a different book each, and the one who read this one also mentioned that it was mostly about knitting.
Interestingly, the reviews I found when I read the book - there seem to be more now - were all on knitting sites.
For me, that also applies to the definition of "craft" specifically for this book which is definitely not in the older sense from the examples the author used.
In German, I have even more problems finding an adequate word for "craft" because the words there are either mean the older definition or seem to imply something that reminds more of children's crafts.
Anyhow, if you advertize the book not just for professionals in the psychology field using crafts to promote mental health, as in occupational therapy for example (instead of sports which is getting more focus nowadays), but also for crafters - not in the sense of craftspeople in the old sense - to help them doing their craft more intentionally in order to get health benefits from it, I think it would have helped to use theory and examples within the text.
Again, I didn't think it was difficult to read, though.
I also want to add again that I'm not a psychologist, I'm simply a crafter who doesn't knit anymore and hasn't done so for years 🙂 That's why I said that this was my personal opinion. I hope this explains where I came from with this review.